Can artificial intelligence assume more and more creative works and more scenarios in which creativity is decisive? The issue is one of the great debates of recent times and one of those that are generating more concern in areas as diverse as the world of advertising, literature or journalism, to put several examples. Get good editing services at https://essayseek.com. Jobs that seemed safe from robots, as their creative nature seemed to bind them decisively to the work of humans, are becoming increasingly threatened by the development of artificial intelligence. And, moreover, what this conquest in one field is potentially dangerous for what happens in another.
In the last realm where artificial intelligence has been testing things or will be in the news world. In fact, the latest move expects the robots to create unsa 30,000 stories a month of local information for The Press Association. They will have the help of real journalists (and humans …) but the work will mainly fall on them. The development will benefit from a € 706,000 grant from Google’s Digital News Initiative (DNI).
The movement is interesting not only because it is a new step in the use of artificial intelligence but because, up to now, the examples of its use in news writing were limited to, above all, routine content. The recurring example was AP, which uses it to write news about economic results of companies, issues in which only have to order numbers.
What he will have to do now is write “irresistible” local news. That is, artificial intelligence will have to deal with those issues of the so-called ‘human interest’ of proximity generated by the local press. In the traditional media are those news that go from the neighbor whose garden gave a zucchini of enormous size to the typical news of local customs, passing through the analysis of local crime.
How will stories be written? How will it work?
Human journalists will be the ones who comb the reality to find stories. So they will use massive databases, from the government, city councils or the health system (the news will be British and Irish), to find current hooks on issues such as crime, health or employment. From there they will create templates and artificial intelligence will create multiple versions of the story adjusted to the local data of many places.
Artificial intelligence will not only multiply the story in a massive way and will produce the theme locally (in many locations) but will also produce graphics, videos and photos in a self-generated way that can be added to the story (or at least that Is what they point out in The Guardian).
For now it is not known very well how it will work, because there are no direct results. The agency is going to start working with it now and is looking for the 5 journalists who will be part of the team and will give artificial intelligence the starting point.
For those who develop the idea this is a way to survive in the local information to the great pressures of spending cuts. For the unions of journalists is a mistake that leads to invest less in quality journalism, as strong stories and journalists are needed to find them. Algorithms can help, they say, but they do not create solid journalism.